We trust schools to keep our children safe. When that doesn’t happen and a child is injured, the impact can be overwhelming — emotionally and financially. A school negligence claim may help ease some of that burden.
A successful claim may cover medical expenses, ongoing care, and your child’s pain and suffering. Most are brought by parents on behalf of their child, although a child can make their own claim once they turn 18.
This guide explains who can make a claim, examples of negligence in schools, and the four steps involved in proving your case.
You may be eligible to make a school negligence claim if your child was injured at school or because of something the school was responsible for.
A school’s duty of care can extend beyond regular school hours or off school grounds if there is a clear connection to the school’s supervision, authority, or known risks — for example, at nearby bus stops, during excursions, or in circumstances linked to school activities. This includes situations where your child experiences bullying that the school knew about but failed to prevent.
Not sure if your child qualifies for a school negligence claim? Use our free claim checker to find out in minutes.
Find out if you’re eligible for a school negligence claim today.
| Source/case | Key legal principle | What it means for your claim |
|---|---|---|
| Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW) | The ‘breach calculus’ (Section 5B) | To prove negligence, you must show the risk was foreseeable and that a ‘reasonable’ school would have taken precautions based on the probability and seriousness of harm. |
| AA v The Trustees [2026] HCA (PDF) | Liability for intentional harm | Schools are now directly liable for intentional or criminal acts (like assault) by staff/delegates if the school’s power dynamic created the opportunity for the abuse. |
| State of NSW v T2 [2025] NSWCA | ‘Beyond the gate’ duty | The school's duty of care doesn't end at the bell or the fence. Schools must provide supervision at known risk points (like bus stops) for a reasonable time after school. |
| Stanberg v NSW [2025] NSWCA | Maintenance vs. inherent risk | While sports have ‘inherent risks’, a school is liable if the injury was caused by poor maintenance (e.g. faulty equipment) that could have been easily fixed. |
Not every injury at school counts as negligence — you’ll need to prove that the risk of injury was serious and that the school could reasonably be expected to prevent it. In our experience, these are some of the specific cases where schools have been held liable for student injuries:
Schools must provide adequate supervision whenever a ‘teacher-student relationship’ exists. This isn’t limited to the classroom; it includes areas where the school knows students congregate (e.g. early arrivals at a playground), high-risk transit points (such as nearby bus stops), or unattended classrooms.
Schools have a duty to ensure their equipment is well-maintained, meets safety standards, and anything high-risk (e.g. trampolines or woodworking machinery) is only used with supervision. They must also repair all known hazards like deep potholes on ovals, decaying tree branches in play areas, or loose balcony railings.
While some risk is inherent in sport, schools must still minimise preventable harm by having equipment that meets Australian safety standards, properly maintaining all facilities and equipment, and ensuring competitors are evenly matched through appropriate age or weight grading. If injuries do occur, schools must assess and manage them properly.
The school must ensure only qualified instructors lead technical subjects like wood or metal work, and that all safety protocols are enforced.
Schools are liable if they fail to conduct a proper risk assessment for school camps, swimming programs, or overseas trips, particularly regarding water safety or transport.
Schools are legally required to have (and uphold) anti-bullying and discipline policies. Claims are often successful when the school was aware of bullying but failed to intervene. Schools may also be liable if staff ignore clear warning signs of an impending fight, such as threats made on social media or reported by other students.
Schools must manage the health needs of vulnerable students. Negligence can occur if the school fails to follow an established management plan for a student with a known condition or does not provide extra supervision or modified activities for students with physical or intellectual disabilities who are at a higher risk of self-injury.
Keep in mind, this is not a complete list — just some common examples. If you don’t see your child’s situation listed here, you may still have a school negligence claim.
Yes, you can sue a school for bullying in NSW. However, these cases are technically demanding because you must prove the school was legally negligent in its response, rather than just proving that bullying occurred.
In many of the school bullying cases we’ve reviewed, a school will be liable if it was ‘on notice’ about the bullying and failed to take reasonable steps to stop it. This includes:
Following the landmark T2 v State of NSW ruling, a school’s duty of care can extend beyond the gate or the 3pm bell in some circumstances. This means you may have a claim if:
In NSW, your child being upset, distressed or experiencing temporary emotional harm is not enough to bring a negligence claim against a school. Under section 31 of the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), damages for ‘pure mental harm’ are only available where there is a recognised psychiatric illness.
This requires a formal diagnosis from an appropriate specialist, such as a psychiatrist. Conditions that may meet this threshold include:
A brief GP note is usually not sufficient. It must be shown that the school’s failure — for example, failing to prevent bullying — caused a clinically recognised condition that has had a significant and ongoing impact on your child’s life or education.
In NSW, there is no fixed payout for school negligence. Instead, the court calculates a settlement using ‘heads of damage’ to address both financial losses and the impact on your child’s life.
As of 2026, minor claims often settle for tens of thousands, but major cases involving permanent injury or severe bullying have resulted in payouts exceeding $1.7 million.
To successfully prove a school negligence claim in 2026, you must meet four specific legal tests.
| Criteria | Legal source | Key requirement |
|---|---|---|
| Duty of Care | Common law | Prove a teacher-student relationship existed at the time. |
| Breach | Section 5B (CLA) | Show the risk was foreseeable and the precautions were ‘reasonable’. |
| Causation | Section 5D (CLA) | Prove the injury wouldn't have occurred ‘but for’ the school's failure. |
| Damage and loss | Civil Liability Act | Provide evidence of physical or psychological harm and financial costs. |
Let’s explore each of these criteria in more detail.
You must show that the school owed your child a duty of care. In NSW, schools owe their students a non-delegable duty of care, meaning they cannot avoid responsibility by shifting blame to a third party such as a bus company, camp provider or external instructor. If a child is under the school’s supervision, the school remains legally responsible for their safety.
Importantly, that duty does not automatically end at 3pm or at the school gate. NSW courts have confirmed that a school’s duty can extend:
A breach occurs if the school fails to take reasonable steps to prevent a foreseeable risk of harm. Under Section 5B of the Civil Liability Act, a court looks at four factors to decide if the school was negligent:
Recent case example: In Stanberg v State of NSW [2025], the court found a school negligent for a long jump injury because maintaining sufficient sand depth was a ‘low-burden precaution’ the school failed to perform.
It is not enough to show a school was careless; you must prove their carelessness directly caused the injury. We use the ‘but for’ test (Section 5D of the CLA): But for the school’s failure to supervise or maintain equipment, would the injury have happened?
The school’s oversight doesn’t have to be the only cause, but it must be a ‘material’ or contributing factor. If the injury was a freak accident that would have happened even with perfect supervision, causation is difficult to prove.
Finally, you must prove that the incident resulted in actual loss. In a legal sense, this may include:
To win a school negligence claim, you need evidence that addresses all four criteria — from internal school incident reports to expert medical assessments. Because every case is unique, we recommend a free consultation to determine if your specific situation meets these legal thresholds.
Yes, time limits are a critical part of a school negligence claim. In NSW, these rules come from the Limitation Act 1969, and how they apply depends on who is starting the claim and when the injury was first ‘discovered’.
You generally have three years from the ‘date of discoverability’ to start your claim. An injury is considered discoverable when you first knew (or reasonably should have known) that:
Example: If a student is bullied in Year 7 but doesn’t develop a diagnosable psychological condition (like PTSD) until Year 10, the three-year clock may not start until that diagnosis is made and linked to the school’s failure to act.
If a child chooses to bring the claim themselves after they grow up, they generally have until their 21st birthday (three years after turning 18) to start the claim.
However, the three-year limitation period is typically not suspended if the child has a ‘capable parent or guardian’. This means if a parent was aware of the injury and the school’s negligence, the three-year clock started from that date.
In all cases, there is an absolute ‘long-stop’ limit of 12 years from the date of the incident. After 12 years, it becomes very difficult to bring a claim — you’ll need to convince the court that it’s ‘just and reasonable’ to allow your case to proceed (Section 62A of the Limitation Act).
Under Section 6A of the Limitation Act 1969, no time limits apply to cases involving the physical or sexual abuse of a child. This means you can successfully bring cases of historical child abuse decades after they occurred.
| Task | Why it matters |
|---|---|
| Take your child to the GP | Creates a legal paper trail of the injury. |
| Get a written report from the school and keep correspondence in writing | Ensures the school cannot claim they were unaware of the risk. Make sure all further correspondence with the school is also in writing. If you have a meeting with the principal, send a follow-up email summarising what was discussed. |
| Request any CCTV | If your child was injured in a specific incident, request any CCTV footage immediately. Many NSW schools overwrite footage within 14 to 30 days. Send a letter to the principal asking that the footage be preserved to protect your child’s position. Even if you are undecided about making a claim, securing the footage now protects your child’s position later. |
| Keep a receipts folder | Tracks all your out-of-pocket costs so they can be factored into your claim. |
| Monitor your child’s recovery | Keep a symptom diary, especially for psychological injuries or concussions, as these symptoms can take weeks to surface. |
| Speak to a lawyer | A lawyer can provide free advice on your rights in the situation. This is especially important if you’ve previously signed a waiver or the school has offered you a settlement. Once you accept a small payment from the principal, you may lose the right to sue for a larger amount later. |
If your child has been injured because of school, legal advice is the best way to understand your rights. You don’t have to take on the Department of Education or a private school board alone.
Here are the specific situations where a lawyer makes a difference:
And the best part? Because we work on a No Win, No Fee basis, there is no financial risk to your family. We cover every upfront cost, and there’s nothing to pay until we win your case.
Yes, you can claim compensation if your child was injured on a school trip. When students are on an excursion, camp or other off-site activity, the school remains responsible for their safety while they are under its supervision.
If your child was hurt because the school failed to take reasonable steps to protect them, you may have grounds for a school negligence claim.
If your child is injured in a public park, liability depends on whether the fault lies with the school’s supervision or the council’s maintenance.
Under the Civil Liability Act 2002 (NSW), the school is generally responsible for the safety of students during any organised off-site activity. Recent cases like Stanberg v State of NSW have confirmed that schools must perform a ‘dynamic risk assessment’ before allowing play, ensuring the environment is safe and supervision is adequate for the specific age group and equipment.
Conversely, the local council is responsible for the physical safety and upkeep of the park itself. Councils have specific legal protection, so to successfully sue one for an injury in a public park, you must typically prove they had ‘actual knowledge’ of a specific hazard. This could be a previous report of broken equipment or uneven surfacing that they failed to act on.
A landmark 2024 ruling (Hornsby Shire Council v Salman) confirmed that councils can be held liable for ‘hidden’ hazards, like improper mulch levels, especially in settings where it is foreseeable that a supervisor’s attention might be momentarily distracted by a child.
Even if the deadline for making a school negligence claim has passed, you may still be able to proceed by asking the court to extend the time limit with a reasonable excuse.
Examples of reasonable excuses include:
Most school negligence claims take between 18 months and 3 years to resolve. The exact timeline depends on a few factors, including:
Over the years, our lawyers have developed processes to streamline your claim and secure compensation in a pre-trial mediation, saving you the time and cost of a formal court hearing.
If your child has been injured and you’re not ready to start a formal negligence claim, you may still recover medical expenses through the school via an ‘unlitigated claim’.
While faster than formal claims, unlitigated claims only cover financial losses. For full compensation, including pain and suffering, a school negligence claim is still the best option.
You cannot make a school negligence claim without proving fault, but you may be eligible for compensation if your school has student accident insurance.
Many parents are unaware that some schools (particularly Catholic and Independent schools, and some public schools via their P&C) have this insurance.
Unlike a negligence claim, this insurance can often pay out even if the school did nothing wrong. For example, if a child simply falls while running.
Use our online claim checker to instantly find out if you have a claim. Alternatively, just give us a ring — our expert lawyers are always ready to answer your questions.
Let us know when it's convenient and one of our team will call you.
With 29 convenient office locations across Australia, we're never far away.
Find your nearest office